From US Social Forum Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "The US Social Forum National Planning Committee and other leaders of grassroots organizations and networks met in Philadelphia to discuss the road to the next US Social Forum. Pa…")
 
 
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The US Social Forum National Planning Committee and other leaders of grassroots organizations and networks met in Philadelphia to discuss the road to the next US Social Forum. Participants in the meeting made the following recommendations to the USSF National Planning Committee:
+
This page is meant to provide people new to the Social Forum process with some relatively short background material that can help provide some of the key pieces of the forum's history and an orientation to the major political debates in the forum. It also provides those working in the forum with documents that can be helpful to ongoing discussions.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*This [[Guide to USSF Communications]] provides tips on how to find information about USSF working groups, meetings, and background.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==  '''The Road to a Third US Social Forum''' ==
 +
*The 2nd US Social Forum in Detroit generated a [http://ggjalliance.org/system/files/PMA%20ActionPlanSummary-FINAL.pdf National Social Movement Agenda] that helped synthesize discussions at the 2nd USSF, identify concrete actions following the USSF, and that should guide the USSF work going forward. In particular, the preamble states:
 +
 
 +
::“Each one of us must dig deeper to understand each other's culture and history and to build respectful relationships across difference...We can realize our dreams to treat each other as equals and to build alliances and relationships across our commonalities and difference.”
 +
 
 +
:This statement is important as we work to build a more cohesive movement with real power to affect large-scale social transformation. We believe this is particularly urgent task for us at this moment of political, economic, and ecological crisis.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*The US Social Forum National Planning Committee and other leaders of grassroots organizations and networks [http://www.ussocialforum.net/node/477 met in Philadelphia] to discuss the road to the next US Social Forum. Participants in the meeting made the following recommendations to the USSF National Planning Committee:
  
 
:'''Recognizing that''' we are moving towards building a national convergence of a US Social Forum of a new type, and that this might take the form of a large-scale convergence in a single city or a decentralized forum held simultaneously in multiple cities, these consensus recommendations will be brought to the NPC for a formal decision.  
 
:'''Recognizing that''' we are moving towards building a national convergence of a US Social Forum of a new type, and that this might take the form of a large-scale convergence in a single city or a decentralized forum held simultaneously in multiple cities, these consensus recommendations will be brought to the NPC for a formal decision.  
Line 8: Line 22:
  
  
To help build towards the next US Social Forum, we invite those in solidarity with the World Social Forum to [[Media: NPC_Membership_Criteria_and_Roles_and_Responsibilities.pdf | get involved]].
+
To help build towards the next US Social Forum, we invite those in solidarity with the World Social Forum to join this work. [[Media: NPC_Membership_Criteria_and_Roles_and_Responsibilities.pdf | Click here]] to see how you can get involved.
 +
 
  
 +
== Background on the US and World Social Forums--History and Evolution of Thinking about Transformative Global Movement Building ==
  
'''Background on the US and World Social Forums--History and Evolution of Thinking about Transformative Global Movement Building'''
+
*[http://www.ussocialforum.net/taxonomy/term/5 US Social Forum Updates]: The regular e-newsletter of the US Social Forum provides useful background and analyses of the political unity, debates, and strategic thinking about the US and World Social Forum process. In addition, readers can learn how different groups have engaged with the USSF process and developed projects that follow from social forum convergences.
  
These resources address questions on the agenda of this NPC meeting, including a report and recommendations related to similar concerns being raised in the World Social Forum's International Council.
+
*[[media: USSF_Perspectives_of_a_Movement_Book.pdf |''The United States Social Forum: Perspectives of a Movement'']] Book written by co-organizers of the first U.S. Social Forum. Edited by Marina Karides, Walda Katz-Fishman, Rose Brewer, Jerome Scott & Alice Lovelace.
  
 +
*Guerrero, Michael Leon. 2012. "US Social Forum: What did we accomplish?" Pp. 364-387 in World Social Forum: Critical Explorations, vol. 3, edited by J. Sen and P. Waterman. New Delhi: Open World Publishers.
 +
::This article provides an excellent overview of the history of the U.S. Social Forum process, written by Michael Leon Guerrero, who played an instrumental role in leading the first two USSFs. His article reports on the lessons from the first USSF in Atlanta and the challenges we continue to face following the 2nd USSF in Detroit. The achievements and lessons of the forums, political conditions in the United States, and relationships with international allies are summarized and analyzed.
  
:[[Media: Cartography_of_the_future_2013.pdf | World Social Forum Cartography of the Future Thematic Discussion:]]--This report emerges from ongoing conversations in the WSF that seek to build upon the lessons from the WSF and other social movement convergences over the past decade. It considers the current political moment of crisis and how the WSF process can contribute to building the planetary citizenship needed for transforming the global economic and political order. As the document states, "We are in a planetary dispute for hegemony and our initiative has to be the contribution to create irreversible citizenship movements, with projects and ideas endowed with a mobilizing strength."
 
  
:[[Media: Working_group_on_future_WSF_Monastir_Report_2012.pdf‎ | Report of the World Social Forum Future of the WSF Working Group:]] This document reflects the current state of discussion and dialogue about how to address ongoing tensions in the WSF process over representation, leadership, and building a radically democratic and responsive movement for global transformation.
+
*[http://www.alainet.org/active/63440  Sen, Jai. 2013. "The WSF over Thirteen Years: Learning by Doing?"] ALAI, América Latina en Movimiento
 +
::This article is written by a member of the local organizing committee of the 2004 World Social Forum in Mumbai, India. It assesses some of the achievements and challenges of the World Social Forums, and what will be most interesting for U.S. readers is the particular importance Sen attributes to the USSF process. The USSF has, according to Sen, “turned the rules of the WSF upside down” to overcome a pattern whereby historically disadvantaged groups have remained marginalized in the WSF process.
  
:[[Media: Smith_Doerr_Summary_Nov_2012_update.pdf‎ | Lessons from the US and World Social Forum Process:]] This analysis compares the practices of the US and European Social Forums to identify lessons about building radically democratic and inclusive spaces of movement-building.
 
  
 +
*[http://www.organizingupgrade.com/index.php/blogs/maria-poblet-todo-el-pueblo-al-sueno/item/971-womens-rights-in-the-age-of-empire-poblet Reflections on Internationalist Solidarity], in Preparation for the 2013 World Social Forum in Tunisia by Maria Poblet
  
 +
*[[Media: Cartography_of_the_future_2013.pdf | World Social Forum Cartography of the Future Thematic Discussion:]]--This report emerges from ongoing conversations in the WSF that seek to build upon the lessons from the WSF and other social movement convergences over the past decade. It considers the current political moment of crisis and how the WSF process can contribute to building the planetary citizenship needed for transforming the global economic and political order. As the document states, "We are in a planetary dispute for hegemony and our initiative has to be the contribution to create irreversible citizenship movements, with projects and ideas endowed with a mobilizing strength."
  
 +
*[http://www.forumdesalternatives.org/en/is-the-world-social-forum-of-use-for-popular-struggles-are-the-social-forum-formulas-adequate-to-that-effect Is the World Social Forum of use for popular struggles? Are the social forum formulas adequate to that effect?] by Samir Amin
  
 +
*[http://www.interfacejournal.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Interface-4-1-Della-Porta.pdf "Mobilizing against the crisis, mobilizing for  “another democracy”: comparing two global waves of protest"] Donatella della Porta, ''Interface'' Journal (2012).
  
'''Key Documents of the USSF process'''
+
*[http://www.interfacejournal.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Interface-4-2-Smith.pdf "Connecting social movements and political moments: bringing movement building tools from global justice to Occupy Wall Street activism"] Jackie Smith, ''Interface'' Journal (2012).
'''The urgency of movement building in the current moment of crisis… On the Road to USSF III'''
 
  
We live day to day in crisis and struggle. For the first time in history we are experiencing a rapidly deepening crisis of global capitalism affecting millions in the United States and billions world-wide – producing austerity policies and massive permanent unemployment and poverty, unimaginable climate, ecological and social destruction, and intensifying political attacks, repression, and the threat of fascism and war everywhere. At the same time, resistance, activism and organizing are on the rise across all continents, sectors, and fronts of struggle.
+
*[http://frantzfanonfoundation-fondationfrantzfanon.com/article2092.html Report of the World Social Forum Future of the WSF Working Group:] and [http://pittcoalitionsworkshop.wikispaces.com/file/view/working+group+on+future+WSF+Monastir+Report+2012.pdf Working group on Future of WSF 2012] These documents reflects the current state of discussion and dialogue about how to address ongoing tensions in the WSF process over representation, leadership, and building a radically democratic and responsive movement for global transformation.
  
This moment requires a huge and unified social movement in the U.S. with millions of politically conscious people to ensure victory for the arising social motion in the interests of the oppressed, exploited, and dispossessed – to protect the earth and affirm life. The US Social Forum can play a role in pushing forward strategic US movement development through the dynamic interrelation of local and regional struggles, and the emergence of a national movement in relation to global movements. The US Social Forum process is striving to step up and take its place in history by advancing the interests of working class, low-income, and grassroots struggles. The moment is urgent and the opportunities are great.
+
*[[Media: Smith_Doerr_Summary_Nov_2012_update.pdf‎ | Lessons from the US and World Social Forum Process:]] This short summary compares the practices of the US and European Social Forums to identify lessons about building radically democratic and inclusive spaces of movement-building.
 +
::[[Media: 18_Smith_and_Doerr_with_References.pdf |Democratic Innovation in the U.S. and European Social Forums]], a more detailed analysis that is basis of above summary, from ''Handbook of World Social Forum Activism''.
  
To advance our struggle for shared understanding, political unity, and participation on the road to US movement building and USSF III, we invite you to read and discuss the US Social Forum political framing documents in your organizations, networks, and collectives.
+
*[http://wiki.ussocialforum.net/images/e/e1/WSF_as_Peacebuilding_Chapter_Smith_Burns_and_Miller.pdf The World Social Forum as Peacebuilding] in ''Globalization, Social Movements and Peacebuilding'' Edited by J. Smith and E. Verdeja, Syracuse University Press, 2013.
  
2.10.13
+
*[http://www.choike.org/2009/eng/informes/1557.html ''The World Social Forum: Challenging Empires''] Edited by Jai Sen, Anita Anand, Arturo Escobar, Peter Waterman
  
The following statements have been developed through US Social Forum Working Groups and discussed and approved by the USSF National Planning Committee. They form the basis of our political unity and help orient our work together.
+
== '''Key Documents of the USSF process''' ==
::''NOTE: We still need to add Spanish versions to this page!
 
''
 
:[[USSF 2014 Goals]]
 
  
:[[Media: What_we_believe.pdf |What we believe, Updated January 2013]] 
+
*[[USSF Political Statements| USSF Political Unity]]
::[[Lo Que Creemos]]
 
  
:[http://wiki.ussf2010.org/wiki/Documenting_and_Evaluating Additional Documentation and Evaluation of USSF 2010]
+
*[http://wiki.ussf2010.org/wiki/Documenting_and_Evaluating Additional Documentation and Evaluation of USSF 2010]
  
:Pittsburgh meeting on coalitions and scholars' roles and relationships to movements :http://pittcoalitionsworkshop.wikispaces.com
 
  
 
'''Ideas for Discussion'''
 
'''Ideas for Discussion'''
  
 
[[Supporting convergence around shared goals]]
 
[[Supporting convergence around shared goals]]

Latest revision as of 13:01, 25 August 2014

This page is meant to provide people new to the Social Forum process with some relatively short background material that can help provide some of the key pieces of the forum's history and an orientation to the major political debates in the forum. It also provides those working in the forum with documents that can be helpful to ongoing discussions.



The Road to a Third US Social Forum

  • The 2nd US Social Forum in Detroit generated a National Social Movement Agenda that helped synthesize discussions at the 2nd USSF, identify concrete actions following the USSF, and that should guide the USSF work going forward. In particular, the preamble states:
“Each one of us must dig deeper to understand each other's culture and history and to build respectful relationships across difference...We can realize our dreams to treat each other as equals and to build alliances and relationships across our commonalities and difference.”
This statement is important as we work to build a more cohesive movement with real power to affect large-scale social transformation. We believe this is particularly urgent task for us at this moment of political, economic, and ecological crisis.


  • The US Social Forum National Planning Committee and other leaders of grassroots organizations and networks met in Philadelphia to discuss the road to the next US Social Forum. Participants in the meeting made the following recommendations to the USSF National Planning Committee:
Recognizing that we are moving towards building a national convergence of a US Social Forum of a new type, and that this might take the form of a large-scale convergence in a single city or a decentralized forum held simultaneously in multiple cities, these consensus recommendations will be brought to the NPC for a formal decision.
• PMAs or other local assemblies will be used to build towards and follow-up national USSF convergence.
• We will organize some sort of national USSF event/activity/convergence in 2014.
• Date of a national USSF convergence will be no later than 2015


To help build towards the next US Social Forum, we invite those in solidarity with the World Social Forum to join this work. Click here to see how you can get involved.


Background on the US and World Social Forums--History and Evolution of Thinking about Transformative Global Movement Building

  • US Social Forum Updates: The regular e-newsletter of the US Social Forum provides useful background and analyses of the political unity, debates, and strategic thinking about the US and World Social Forum process. In addition, readers can learn how different groups have engaged with the USSF process and developed projects that follow from social forum convergences.
  • Guerrero, Michael Leon. 2012. "US Social Forum: What did we accomplish?" Pp. 364-387 in World Social Forum: Critical Explorations, vol. 3, edited by J. Sen and P. Waterman. New Delhi: Open World Publishers.
This article provides an excellent overview of the history of the U.S. Social Forum process, written by Michael Leon Guerrero, who played an instrumental role in leading the first two USSFs. His article reports on the lessons from the first USSF in Atlanta and the challenges we continue to face following the 2nd USSF in Detroit. The achievements and lessons of the forums, political conditions in the United States, and relationships with international allies are summarized and analyzed.


This article is written by a member of the local organizing committee of the 2004 World Social Forum in Mumbai, India. It assesses some of the achievements and challenges of the World Social Forums, and what will be most interesting for U.S. readers is the particular importance Sen attributes to the USSF process. The USSF has, according to Sen, “turned the rules of the WSF upside down” to overcome a pattern whereby historically disadvantaged groups have remained marginalized in the WSF process.


  • World Social Forum Cartography of the Future Thematic Discussion:--This report emerges from ongoing conversations in the WSF that seek to build upon the lessons from the WSF and other social movement convergences over the past decade. It considers the current political moment of crisis and how the WSF process can contribute to building the planetary citizenship needed for transforming the global economic and political order. As the document states, "We are in a planetary dispute for hegemony and our initiative has to be the contribution to create irreversible citizenship movements, with projects and ideas endowed with a mobilizing strength."
Democratic Innovation in the U.S. and European Social Forums, a more detailed analysis that is basis of above summary, from Handbook of World Social Forum Activism.

Key Documents of the USSF process


Ideas for Discussion

Supporting convergence around shared goals